Opposition finance spokesman Barnaby Joyce has confirmed an Abbott government has plans to slash public sector jobs and services.
Abbott has PS razor list already written: Joyce
(This article originally published in the Canberra Times)
An Abbott government would cut the public service and has already identified jobs that will go, Opposition finance spokesman Barnaby Joyce says.
Senator Joyce also questioned Australia's funding of a food program that helps feed mothers and children in countries including Haiti.
He committed yesterday the Opposition to reducing the size of the public sector.
''Through the [Expenditure Review Committee] process we have already gone down, we have identified savings. These will be tabled before the election,''
he said. He did not identify where those savings would come from, and said the Coalition was still looking for more savings. Savings were needed because Labor's increasing debt meant the money would eventually run out.
''The only way you can save jobs in the future of the public service is to control costs now. If you don't control costs now, you are putting at risk more people in the public service,'' he said.
Community and Public Sector Union deputy secretary Nadine Flood said this comment was baffling.
''Australia is facing many serious challenges like climate change, an ageing workforce, the education revolution and health reform. Having a well-resourced and independent public sector is crucial to finding our way through this,'' she said.
The ACT's Labor politicians Bob McMullen, Annette Ellis and Kate Lundy issued a statement calling for more information about how many public service jobs would be cut by a Coalition government.
''When the Howard government took power in 1996, they took an axe to the public service in Canberra, cut tens of thousands of local jobs, and helped cause a local recession,'' they said.
ACT Liberal senator Gary Humphries said he had discussed the comments with Senator Joyce and ''reaffirmed my long-standing view that any decisions made by a future Coalition government must take into account the interests of the Canberra community and the need for a strong and effective public service to serve that government''.
An incoming Coalition government would face ''tough decisions to rein in the rising deficits and spiralling debt''.
''I will, however, use my position as a member of the Coalition front bench to ensure that any such decisions take full account of the needs of my own community,'' he said.
Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner said public-sector job cuts would put ''at risk the provision of vital welfare, safety and health services''.
''The federal public service increased dramatically in the last five years under the Howard government and has been held relatively stable in the two years of the Rudd Government,'' he said.
Senator Joyce also questioned the Government giving $50 million to the World Bank to deal with food inflation in the third world, but stopped short of saying Australia's aid budget should be cut. He said Australia was borrowing money to send back overseas.
The funding he referred to is part of the Global Food Crisis Response Group, which is used to feed poor children, pregnant women and lactating mothers. It goes to many poor countries, including Haiti.
(This article was originally published in the Canberra Times)
Comments(44)
Posted by:RK, Defence - 11 Feb 2010, 11:05am DONT FORGET THE RUDD GOVT WAS AFTER OUR JOBS TOO
Posted by:JJ - 8 Feb 2010, 7:30pm Why does every incoming government (no matter what party) always start with reviewing the size of their public service? It always seems to be the first priority and they must think its good for the electorate to hear this stuff.
Posted by:Ruth Panozzo - 8 Feb 2010, 9:57am Love the T-Shirt! The irony is that any APS employee would proabably be sacked for wearing that one. The APS is held to a very stringent code of values. The Libs may think they can outsource many of the jobs we do to save money. That would be a severe mistake, opening the door to graft and high costs of litigation for those entities that do not do the right thing. I wish for once the Libs would come up with something new!
Posted by:Richard Featherston - 8 Feb 2010, 9:18am Pre election, Rudd talked about his potential 'Razor Gang' with barely a word let alone any protests from the union or members of the Public Sector. Credibility is when you voice your dissatisfaction irrespective of what side of the House the comments come from - having double standards is when you are selective.
Posted by:Bob - 8 Feb 2010, 8:53am As a Melbourne-based Defence employee, I've found that it doesn't matter what side of the political spectrum ones bias is, all governments are faced with the same problems, issues and interest groups, but at the end of the day it all comes down to MONEY and the management thereof. And when it comes to trying to save money, Defence seems to be the Cash-Cow that successive governments eye off first - as bothe Howard and Rudd have done. However, check out the Gazette for an advertised regional Defence position and then check out a Canberra-based one, and it becomes very obvious where the cuts take place.
The CPSU ought to abondon its affiliation with the (American) "Labor" Party and support whichever party that takes the most favourable position towards the APS.
DONT FORGET THE RUDD GOVT WAS AFTER OUR JOBS TOO
Why does every incoming government (no matter what party) always start with reviewing the size of their public service? It always seems to be the first priority and they must think its good for the electorate to hear this stuff.
Love the T-Shirt! The irony is that any APS employee would proabably be sacked for wearing that one. The APS is held to a very stringent code of values. The Libs may think they can outsource many of the jobs we do to save money. That would be a severe mistake, opening the door to graft and high costs of litigation for those entities that do not do the right thing. I wish for once the Libs would come up with something new!
Pre election, Rudd talked about his potential 'Razor Gang' with barely a word let alone any protests from the union or members of the Public Sector. Credibility is when you voice your dissatisfaction irrespective of what side of the House the comments come from - having double standards is when you are selective.
As a Melbourne-based Defence employee, I've found that it doesn't matter what side of the political spectrum ones bias is, all governments are faced with the same problems, issues and interest groups, but at the end of the day it all comes down to MONEY and the management thereof. And when it comes to trying to save money, Defence seems to be the Cash-Cow that successive governments eye off first - as bothe Howard and Rudd have done. However, check out the Gazette for an advertised regional Defence position and then check out a Canberra-based one, and it becomes very obvious where the cuts take place. The CPSU ought to abondon its affiliation with the (American) "Labor" Party and support whichever party that takes the most favourable position towards the APS.